Legal Opinion

McVerry v. Kidwell

California Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Per curiam

This is an action to recover an assessment for constructing a sewer in the city and county of San Francisco. The defense was that the sewer was not constructed in accordance with the contract and specifications. The court found that the contract required the work to be done in a good and workmanlike manner, the bricks to be sound and hard-burned, one barrel of cement to be used to each barrel of sand, and no lime to be used; that at least seven per centum of the bricks used were not sound hard-burned bricks, but were of quality inferior thereto, and were used with intent to cheat and defraud…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sanitary District of Chicago v. McMahon & Montgomery Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  2. Santa Cruz Rock Pavement Co. v. BowieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API