Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Cavanagh

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 20, 2001No. 01-55187; D.C. No. CV-00-12617-R/RZxPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM2

Stephen Cavanagh, Daniel Vreeland and Vreeland Cadillac, Inc. (collectively, “Vreeland”), appeal a prehminary injunction entered by the district court prohibiting them from pursuing claims in state court against General Motors Corporation (“GM”) that were or could have been raised in a previous federal action that was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to a settlement agreement. Because the district court was properly protecting its pri- or order, we affirm.

I

Vreeland first argues that the district court did not have jurisdiction to issue the injunction. GM counters that the district…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API