Legal Opinion

Moseley v. Hearrell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1943No. 8072PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alexander

This suit was brought by J. A. Moseley, Jr., against Mrs. Lolá Hearrell and others for partition of the mineral interest in a one-acre tract of land. The trial court found that the mineral interest was incapable of partition in kind, and ordered it sold by a receiver and the proceeds divided. The judgment was rendered by the Court of Civil Appeals. 168 S. W. (2d) 317.

R. N. Wood originally owned the mineral interest in the tract of land in question. His interest was encumbered with a covenant that no more than one oil well would ever be drilled on the land. A firm of attorneys held an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Southwestern Settlement & Development Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Henderson v. ChesleyTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Goodloe & Meredith v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Blackmarr v. WilliamsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Morris v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Thomas v. McNair, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  2. Yturria v. Kimbro, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
  3. Warner v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Texas Oil & Gas Corp. v. OstromCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Chaffin v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API