Legal Opinion

Jamison v. Hendricks

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1827PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Circuit Court.—Hendricks brought an action of trover against Jamison for a horse. Plea, not guilty. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff below.

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Trover for a horse. The substance of tbe evidence, as set forth in a bill of exceptions, was, that Hendricks lent the horse to Davis, in Marion county, to ride to Corydon. The horse was taken in execution, at Corydon, as the property of Davis, and sold, and Jamison became the purchaser. At the time of the levy, Davis proclaimed that the horse was not his, but belonged to Hendricks. Before tbe commencement of this suit, Jamison fold one of the witnesses, that, when Hendricks came in search of his horse, he was out at grass. After the commencement of the suit, Davis observed to Jamison, that he…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. La Place v. AupoixNew York Supreme Court · 1800

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greenlow v. RawlingsTennessee Supreme Court · 1842
  2. Greenlow v. RawlingsTennessee Supreme Court · 1842

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API