Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 19, 1994No. 92-02801PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Judge.

The appellant, Troy Williams, challenges his judgments and sentences for kidnapping, sexual battery, and forgery. Though Williams raises two issues on appeal, we find merit only in his contention that he was improperly classified as a habitual offender. We, therefore, reverse and remand on that issue alone.

*677Citing State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993), and Rankin v. State, 620 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), Williams contends he was improperly habitualized under an unconstitutional version of the habitual offender statute, i.e., section '775.084(1)(b)(1), Florida Statutes (1989),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Rankin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Burton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API