Henderson v. City of Saint Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Defendant appeals from an order overruling its general demurrer to the complaint. The court certified the question presented thereby to be important and doubtful.
The facts alleged may. be thus summarized:
St. Paul is a duly incorporated city and as such maintains a public street, known as Summit avenue, extending in an easterly and westerly direction; “that certain portions of said street have two lanes of travel, one for eastbound, the other for westbound, traffic, said lanes being divided by parkways; that each of said lanes is about 25 feet in width; that one of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clinkenbeard v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Greenland v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Heron v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- McCarthy v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Ray v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robinson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Mix v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Belt v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- Larson v. Township of New Haven, Olmsted CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Watson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.