Legal Opinion

In Re Yates

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1997No. 97-0734PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Relators, five Justices of the nine-member Fourteenth Court of Appeals, petition for mandamus to direct that court’s chief justice to “submit for an en banc vote all requests from a Justice seeking en banc consideration of a case” and to “permit a concurrence of a majority of the Justices sitting en banc to establish rules for, and implement, the en banc transaction or delegation of all business of the Court other than the hearing of cases.” We deny the relief requested.

“Mandamus issues only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or the violation of a duty imposed by law when there is no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. In Re CastilloTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Michael L. Lacey v. Constable Ruben C. Tejeda, Constable for Precinct Five (5) of Bexar County, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  4. Steward Health Care System LLC and Southwest General Hospital, LP v. Frank Saidara, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2021
  5. Winstead PC v. Dewey M. Moore, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API