Legal Opinion
Gruening v. Sucic
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 16, 1980No. Civ. A. No. 80-1880PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff’s complaint states two causes of action. Count I is an action against defendants Sucic for personal injuries resulting from the alleged negligent operation of their motor vehicle. Count II is an action against defendant State Farm Mutual Insurance Company [State Farm]-insurer of both plaintiff and the Sucics-in which plaintiff seeks punitive damages. Plaintiff alleges that State Farm maliciously breached its fiduciary relationship with him when the same insurance adjuster represented both plaintiff and the Sucics, and then used all the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vicente Acevedo Velez v. Crown Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Paz R. Hernandez v. The Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Gerald Bourget, and Security Insurance Company of Hartford, Inc., Intervening v. Government Employees Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- O'Hanlon v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Walker v. FIREMANS FUND INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Transport Trailer Service, Inc. v. Upjohn Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Keystone Paper Converters, Inc. v. Neemar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983