Legal Opinion

Williams v. LEE APPAREL CO., INC.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 24, 1992No. 2910227PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Following an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court found that Lynda Williams (employee) had developed carpal tunnel syndrome arising out of and in the course of her employment with Lee Apparel Company (employer). The court further found the employee to be permanently disabled to the extent of 20% of the body as a whole and held that she had sustained a 20% loss in earning ability. Benefits were awarded accordingly. The employee appeals, contending that the trial court erred in failing to find that she was permanently and totally disabled. We affirm.

At the outset we note that appellate review…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. DeHart v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  3. International Paper Co. v. RogersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Cook v. MunnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  5. Dees v. Daleville FloristCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Southern Energy Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ex Parte Alabama Ins. Guar. Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Reeves Rubber, Inc. v. WallaceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. Ex Parte RheaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Easley v. HUNTSVILLE-MADISON CTY. PUBLIC LIBRARYCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API