Hassoun v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the defendant’s judgment. Appellant was charged with the unlawful act of purchase of a controlled substance pursuant to section 893.13(l)(e) and (l)(a)l, Florida Statutes (1989). Hence, his argument that he thought he was purchasing one controlled substance — marijuana— when he actually purchased another controlled substance — cocaine—is immaterial. Knowledge of the particular nature of the controlled substance is not a required element of a charge of purchase under section 893.13(l)(e) or (l)(a)l, Florida Statutes. See State v. Ryan, 413 So.2d 411 (Fla. 4th *216DCA), rev. denied, 421…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kord v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- State v. RyanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- McBee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ryals v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Hassoun v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992