Legal Opinion

Hassoun v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 13, 1992No. 91-1429PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the defendant’s judgment. Appellant was charged with the unlawful act of purchase of a controlled substance pursuant to section 893.13(l)(e) and (l)(a)l, Florida Statutes (1989). Hence, his argument that he thought he was purchasing one controlled substance — marijuana— when he actually purchased another controlled substance — cocaine—is immaterial. Knowledge of the particular nature of the controlled substance is not a required element of a charge of purchase under section 893.13(l)(e) or (l)(a)l, Florida Statutes. See State v. Ryan, 413 So.2d 411 (Fla. 4th *216DCA), rev. denied, 421…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kord v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. State v. RyanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. McBee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ryals v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Hassoun v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API