Legal Opinion

Balik v. City of Las Vegas

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided October 20, 2021No. 2:21-cv-01701Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 JEREMIAH WILLIAM BALIK, Case No.: 2:21-cv-01701-RFB-NJK 9 Plaintiff, Order 10 v. [Docket No. 9] 11 CITY OF LAS VEGAS, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to be permitted to serve Defendant Rahm 14 Emanuel via social media. Docket No. 9. The motion is properly resolved without a hearing. See 15 Local Rule 78-1. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is hereby DENIED. 16 I. STANDARDS 17 Generally, service must be effectuated according to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The 18 purpose of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Richard Blaisdell v. C. FrappieaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Neumont University, LLC v. NicklesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API