Legal Opinion

Manry v. Farmers Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 17, 1932No. 9016PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHim, J.

The verdict directed was the only one which could legally have been found under the pleadings and the evidence; and the court did not err in refusing' an injunction and in overruling the motion for new trial. This case is distinguishable from Doyal v. Moultrie Banking Co., 163 Ga. 140 (135 S. E. 501), and McDuffie v. Merchants Bank, 168 Ga. 231 (147 S. E. 111), which rested upon a different basis.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. B. H. Manry, for plaintiff. Willingham & Willingham, for defendant.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Moultrie Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. McDuffie v. Merchants BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zellner v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954