Legal Opinion

Bacon v. Grossman

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Actiow for money had and received to the alleged use of the plaintiff’s assignors. Motion for new trial upon dismissal of the complaint for insufficiency of proof.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

Upon the dismissal of the complaint, I assumed, consistently with the contention of the plaintiff’s counsel, that the guaranty hereinafter alluded to was assignable, but that it did not pass to the plaintiff’s assignors as a mere incident to the transfer of the stock, and since the transfer of the stock was made “ subject to ” the agreement between the defendant and the General Electric Company, that the plaintiff’s assignors, as transferees thereof, acquired the stock in subordination to the rights of the General Electric Company and with none of the benefits resulting to the defendant from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Evansville National Bank v. KaufmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Patrick v. . MetcalfNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Friedlander v. New York Plate Glass InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shiya v. EricksonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API