Legal Opinion

Emray Realty Corp. v. Jackson

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 28, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Summary proceedings were designed to provide i lie landlord with a simple, expeditious, and inexpensive means of regaining possession of his premises for nonpayment of rent. The proceedings should not be so hypercritically restricted as to destroy the very remedy which they are designed to afford. (Reich v. Cochran, 201 N. Y. 450.)

The cases following Reich v. Cochran (supra) have indicated a clear trend to disregard picayune objections which involve trivial errors not affecting substantial rights of the tenant. The failure to sign the copy of the petition served upon the tenant is not a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lex-56th Corp. v. MorganCity of New York Municipal Court · 1960
  2. Torah v. HowardCity of New York Municipal Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API