Legal Opinion

Molnoski v. Batmasian

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided March 31, 2017No. Case No. 16-cv-81789-BLOOM/VallePublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM

BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff Michael Molnoski’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim, ECF No. [19] (the “Motion”), seeking to dismiss Defendants James and Marta Batmasian’s (“Defendants”) Counterclaim contained in the Answer, ECF No. [11] (“Ans.”). The Court has carefully reviewed the Motion, all supporting submissions, the applicable law, and the record in this case. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is granted.

I. Background

Plaintiff asserts a claim against Defendants for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Republic Health Corporation v. Lifemark Hospitals of Florida, Inc., Associated Medical Institutions, Inc., and Hialeah Hospitals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Todd Pioch v. IBEX Engineering Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper Fund, Inc. v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. Chatham Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025
  2. Lopez v. Lonch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API