Legal Opinion

State v. Gilmore

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 17, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case, recently reassigned to the writer, is a proceeding under Section 9934, Revised Statutes 1929, filed by the Attorney General on behalf of the State. Judgment is sought against the Collector of Mississippi County for the State's proportion of fees, alleged to have been retained in excess of the amounts allowed by Section 9935, Revised Statutes 1929, as amended Laws 1933, page 454, and Section 9935A, added Laws 1935, page 406. The trial court found for defendant and dismissed the case. The State has appealed from final judgment of dismissal.

[1] The facts were agreed to be as stated in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. County of Buchanan v. FulksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  2. State ex rel. Shannon County v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Hethcock v. Crawford CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Dameron v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  5. Harrington v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lucas v. MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. State v. LudwigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. State Ex Rel. Ad Trend, Inc. v. City of Platte CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API