United States v. Frederick E. Scott, United States of America v. Joe J. Richard
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
Frederick E. Scott and Joe J. Richard appeal their convictions of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. Both defendants contend that the evidence was insufficient to support their convictions. Additionally, Scott contends that the district court 1 abused its discretion by refusing a discovery request and by making inappropriate comments at trial, and Richard contends that the government violated Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), and that he was denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
I
The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. Earnest Washington, United States of America v. Wendell E. FortenberryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. FregosoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Darrell Hill (97-5009) and Donald L. Gunn (97-5010)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Mark Andrew Harrington v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Gary L. Jones, Also Known as BlackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.