Liepman v. Rothschild
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFarrington, J.
The plaintiff recovered a judgment in the trial court against the defendant in the sum of $2338.68, which was the result of a trial by a jury, from which judgment the defendant appeals alleging a number of errors in the trial.
The cause of action grew out of the purchase of German marks by the parties to this law suit. The peti tion filed by the plaintiff contained two counts; the first count alleges that plaintiff and defendant purchased $3500 worth of German marks and defendant was to own $1500 worth of them tand plaintiff $2000 worth, and that the understanding between them was that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peabody v. . SpeyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Cosgrove v. StangeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
- Hughey v. EyssellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Winkelman v. MaddoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Equitable Trust Co. v. KeeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harper v. St. Joseph Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Glick v. GlickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Boatmen's National Bank v. FleddermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Jack Brandt, Ltd. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966