Legal Opinion

Faber v. Siegel

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 11, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPette, J.

The issues in this action were submitted to the court upon an agreed state of facts. The Astoria Mercantile Corporation, incorporated under the Business Corporations Law of the State of New York, made a loan of $1,000 to one David Siegel, a stockholder therein, which was secured by a demand promissory note, bearing the indorsement of three people, one of whom was Sam Jacavsky, a defendant herein. The corporation retained sixty dollars, the interest in advance on said loan, and David Siegel received the sum of $940 at the time of the execution and delivery of the note. The note was to be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Halsey v. WinantNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Hubbard v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Wheelock v. . LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Sands v. . ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  5. Allerton v. . BeldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API