Legal Opinion

In re Delaplaine

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 15, 1887Published

Application for probate of codicil to decedent’s will.

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate

Amelia A. Stolzel and Arthur F. Stolzel, as devisees and legatees under an instrument claimed to have been executed by this decedent on *399July 17th, 1883, as a second codicil to a paper heretofore admitted to probate as his last will and testament, commenced in June last a proceeding in this court for the probate of such second codicil.

It is alleged in their petition that the decedent died in February, 1885, in the city of New York ; that he left in the said city personal assets of • great value; that the paper under which the petitioners claim came into being in the city of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sipperly v. . BaucusNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. Brick's EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1862
  3. Isham v. GibbonsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1849
  4. Seaman v. . DuryeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  5. Pew v. HastingsNew York Court of Chancery · 1846

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API