United States v. Doe
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
The sentencing of defendant John Doe 1 compels this Court to consider whether, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), federal district courts may impose sentences below the range suggested by the now-advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines solely to mitigate perceived sentencing disparities between defendants convicted of possessing or distributing cocaine base (crack) and those who are convicted of possessing or distributing a like quantity of powder cocaine. The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Juan CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- United States v. WillisDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2007