Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Barreto

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 18, 2012No. 3D11-1382Published

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See In re Estate of Paris, 699 So.2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (Stockman requirement is inapplicable to attorney’s fee claims in probate proceeding); Levine v. Keaster, 862 So.2d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (appellant must identify the particular allegedly erroneous items of challenged attorney’s fees award).

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Levine v. KeasterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. In Re Estate of ParisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997