Legal Opinion

Marr v. Doran

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 31, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

The defendants, copartners, were tenants at will of the plaintiff for several months prior to April 22, 1939, when Doran withdrew from the firm, eliminated his name from the sign upon the premises, removed his personal property, turned over the key to Kenney, and notified in writing the plaintiff’s agent that he was no longer connected with the business, that Kenney alone would continue it, and that he had given his key to Kenney. The plaintiff’s agent informed both Doran and Kenney that he wanted the rent and that he would hold the partnership liable. Kenney continued in occupation until…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leavitt v. MaykelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Selig v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Taylor v. TusonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Whicher v. CottrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Krasne v. Tedeschi & GrassoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Golburgh v. BarthelmesMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Washington Savings Inst. v. PeikesMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API