Legal Opinion

Gusmano v. J & A Associates

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 6, 1997No. 96-2676Published

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Judge.

Vittorio Gusmano, who was working more than forty hours per week at the time of his injury, contends appellees did not prove he was a “part-time worker,” even though the judge of compensation claims so found. During the thirteen weeks next preceding his injury, Mr. Gusmano worked full-time in all but one of the weeks in which he worked installing tile. The judge of compensation claims nevertheless calculated Mr. Gusma-no’s average weekly wage as if he were a part-time employee: His employer did not need his tile installation services during seven of the thirteen weeks…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. JJ Murphy & Son, Inc. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  2. Albertson's Inc. v. NataleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Eaton v. Pinebrook Place Health Care CenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Silver Springs, Inc. v. ScardoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Mauranssi v. Centerline Utilities Contract Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API