Legal Opinion

Starling v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 3, 1938No. 2013PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice,

This suit was brought by Joe M. Hill, as receiver for Midwest Mortgage Corpo-. ration, against Lee I. Starling, L. H. Bowie and seven other defendants to recover the sum of $255,368.83. Said seven other defendants were the former directors of Midwest Mortgage Corporation. It was alleged, in substance, that the Midwest Mortgage Corporation, with a capital stock of $500,000, had been incorporated to invest in tax titles to real estate; that the State Brokerage Corporation was engaged in the general investment business; that the offices of said two corporations were the same;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daniels v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Lancaster v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. v. Nortex Oil & Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hart v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
  3. Belz v. Belz, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  4. Cathey v. First City Bank of Aransas Pass, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  5. In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & Erisa Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API