Starling v. Hill
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ALEXANDER, Justice,
This suit was brought by Joe M. Hill, as receiver for Midwest Mortgage Corpo-. ration, against Lee I. Starling, L. H. Bowie and seven other defendants to recover the sum of $255,368.83. Said seven other defendants were the former directors of Midwest Mortgage Corporation. It was alleged, in substance, that the Midwest Mortgage Corporation, with a capital stock of $500,000, had been incorporated to invest in tax titles to real estate; that the State Brokerage Corporation was engaged in the general investment business; that the offices of said two corporations were the same;…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Daniels v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Lancaster v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. v. Nortex Oil & Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
- Hart v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
- Belz v. Belz, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
- Cathey v. First City Bank of Aransas Pass, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & Erisa Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.