Purdy v. Purdy
High Court of Chancery of Maryland
[The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the Chancellor’s opinion.]
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor :
The question involved in this case has twice engaged the attention of the Court of Appeals, and upon each of these occasions, the widows claiming dower in lands which had been held by equitable titles in their husbands, were defeated.
In the first case, which was that of Hopkins et al. vs. Frey, 2 Gill, 359, the husband executed a mortgage of the land *548prior to the marriage, and then after the .marriage, but prior to the Act of 1818, ch. 193, he mortgaged his equity of redemption, which was sold under a decree obtained by the mortgagees in the year 1823, and it was against these…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Miller v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1845
- Hopkins v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1844
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shaffer v. FettyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
- Rodney v. LandauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Philbert v. CampbellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Kroll v. CoachOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Wade v. SewellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · 1893