Legal Opinion

Wingard v. Bobal

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County

Decided December 15, 1941No. 60PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Laub, J.,

This is a rule to show cause why the above appeal should not be quashed and stricken off.

The facts are that plaintiff recovered a judgment for $112.14 against defendant on September 8, 1941, before Alderman E. D. Warg of the City of Bethlehem, Northampton County. On the 15th day of September, 1941, defendant appeared before said alderman and made the statutory affidavit for the purpose of taking an appeal to court. On the transcript of the alderman the appeal bond appears as follows:

“Now, September 1941, Defendant appeal. Bail justified, I am held in the sum of $50 cash as bail…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New Castle Metal Products Co. v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Womelsdorf v. HeifnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  3. Koenig v. BauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  4. Lentz v. Kittanning Real Estate Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Bream v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gable v. CHINTALASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Mellon National Bank v. Black, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API