Legal Opinion

People v. Alexis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

The record establishes that defendant was mentally competent at the time of trial (see Pate v Robinson, 383 US 375 [1966]). The court’s determination that defendant was fit to proceed is entitled to great weight on appeal, given the conflicting medical testimony at the competency hearing (see People v McMillan, 212 AD2d 445 [1995], lv denied 85 NY2d 976 [1995]). The record supports the court’s decision to credit the People’s psychiatrists, who found defendant competent.

Neither defendant’s brief psychiatric hospitalization two months after the competency determination nor his behavior at trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. People v. TortoriciNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. People v. McMillanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. BowmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API