Legal Opinion
Stieve v. H.R.H. Construction
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 1970PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel R. Rosenberg, J.
Defendant H.R.H. Construction moves for dismissal of the complaint upon the ground that its maintenance is time barred. By separate motion defendant Carver Concrete Corp. moves for the dismissal upon the same ground or, in the alternative, upon the ground that plaintiff failed to make timely service of the complaint. The action is based upon wrongful death which occurred on January 26, 1966. The summons was served on the defendant H.R.H. Construction on November 12, 1968, and on the defendant Carver on December 30, 1968. The death action is brought on behalf of the sole survivors of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Travelers Insurance v. Louis Padula Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Graham & Norton Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- In re the Estate of OrtizNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969
- Mossip v. F. H. Clement & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Santaniello v. De FranciscoNew York Supreme Court · 1973