Legal Opinion

Conley v. Horner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 30, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the District Court of Kingfisher County, before Jno. L. McAtee, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Hainer, J.:

This was an action brought in the district court of Kingfisher county July 5, 1894, by E. W. Hill as plaintiff, against H. N. Horner, B. J. Conley and J. C. Caldwell as defendants, involving a certain partnership contract between said parties which the plaintiff alleges was entered into between all of said parties as a partnership, under the firm name and style of Conley & Caldwell, for the purpose of constructing an extension to the water works system of the city of Kingfisher. The plaintiff asked for an accounting and a settlement of the partnership affairs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Oklahoma City v. Hill Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  2. T Peka Commercial Security Co. v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arnold v. JoinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Frear v. State Ex Rel. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. E. M. Biggs Tie & Store Co. v. Arlington Land Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Arnold v. JoinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Lee v. HesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API