Legal Opinion

Peebler v. Olds

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1945No. L. A. No. 19063PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The matters before us arise upon an appeal from a judgment granting a permanent injunction. On May 26, 1944, the clerk’s and reporter’s transcripts were filed in the reviewing court. On July 6, forty-one days later, respondents noticed a motion to be heard September 27, to strike the reporter’s transcript on the ground that it was not prepared and certified within the time or in the manner prescribed by law. Included in the same document and designated to be heard at the same time, was a motion to dismiss the appeal for failure of the appellants to file their opening brief.

The time…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. JaccardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Averill v. LincolnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Riskin v. TowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Jarkieh v. BadagliaccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Crocker v. CrockerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mumaw v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. People v. HickokCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Youlian v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Peebler v. OldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Drake v. DavisAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API