Legal Opinion
Strange v. Barrow
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 15, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Contracts. Non est factum. Lost papers. Evidence. Before E. M. Butt, Esq., Judge pro hac vice. SchleySuperior Court. October Term, 1878. Reported in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Crawford, Justice.
The plaintiffs in error brought their action of complaint against the defendants to recover upon the following contract :
“State of Georgia—Schley County.
“Agreement made and entered into this day—Shadrich Wall of one part and Shadrich Drew of the other part, both of said county and state—S. Wall hath this day paid the said S. Drew one thousand dollars, for which he is to live on the Collum place during my life-time, be it long or short; and he is to attend faithfully to all my plantation business, and all ordinary business, such as weighing out, paying, col*24lecting; and he is…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Crockett & Co. v. Garrard & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Thornton v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Barrett v. PascoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913