Legal Opinion

In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of MacKay

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1888PublishedCited by 54 opinions

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made November 6, 1886, which affirmed a decree of the. surrogate of St. Lawrence county refusing to admit to probate an instrument purporting to be the last will of James Mackay, deceased. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. There was a sufficient acknowledgment of his subscription by the testator to the subscribing witnesses.

Read the full summary

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made November 6, 1886, which affirmed a decree of the. surrogate of St. Lawrence county refusing to admit to probate an instrument purporting to be the last will of James Mackay, deceased. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. There was a sufficient acknowledgment of his subscription by the testator to the subscribing witnesses. (Baskin, v. Baskin, 36 N. Y. 416, 419; Willis v. Willis, 36 id. 486; Ellis v. Smith, 1 Ves. Sr. 11; Nickerson v. Buck, 12 Cush.…

1Opinion of the CourtEarl, J.

The subscribing witnesses came to the dwelling-house of the deceased by previous appointment, and while seated at his writing desk he said to them, “ Gentlemen, what I sent for you for was to sign my last will and testament.” Thereupon he took from his writing desk the instrument, offered for probate, and laying it before the witnesses said: “It is now all ready awaiting your signatures.” He then presented the instrument to the witness McCarrier for his signature and he signed it, saying as he did so, “ I am glad, Father Mackay, you are mating your will at this time; I don’t suppose it will…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. . MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Willis v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1867

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Will of Hull v. HullSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Steinkuehler v. WempnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Nunn v. EhlertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Tobin v. HaackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. In Re the Probate of the Will of BernseeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API