Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Crouch

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 19, 1956No. 36974PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties to this action occupy the same relative positions here as in the trial court, and will hereinafter be referred to by their trial court designation. The plaintiff brought suit to recover for material and labor furnished the defendant in constructing improvements on several different tracts of property owned by the defendant; including his homestead. After the original petition was filed, the defendant filed a petition in bankruptcy in the Federal Court. Thereafter, the plaintiff filed an amended petition. stating a certain amount of the total alleged to be due had been furnished to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Key v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Bryan v. Orient Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Peerson v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Kleindorfer v. Dascomb-Daniels Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Holland v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Pauls Valley v. CrudupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. In Re TefertillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Bovasso v. SampleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Coble v. BowersCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. Shawver & Son, Inc. v. TefertillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API