Legal Opinion

Foster v. Iberia, St. M. & E. R.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 13, 1911No. 18,690PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by J. Warren Foster and others against the Iberia, St. Mary & Eastern Railroad Company and others. Rule to show cause why an order should not be granted for the opening of ballot boxes was granted, and plaintiff moved for an appeal, which was denied, and thereupon applied for writs of mandamus and prohibition.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

Relators have applied for writs of mandamus to the trial judge, ordering him to grant a suspensive appeal from an interlocutory order rendered in the above-entitled suit, which is one contesting the validity of a special election held on June 23, 1910, to take the sense of the property taxpayers of the Third ward, parish of St. Mary, on the question of levying a tax of five mills in favor of the Iberia, St. Mary & Eastern Railroad Company.

It appears that the defendant presented a petition to the trial judge, alleging that the plaintiff, among other averments putting at issue the legality and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ikerd v. Judge of the Eighth District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  2. Gonsoulin v. DecuirSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  3. State ex rel. Street v. RightorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  4. State ex rel. Hearsey v. TalbotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  5. State ex rel. Tureaud v. Parish Judge of AscensionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cunningham v. Penn Mut. Life Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API