Legal Opinion
Bergerman v. Lindsay
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaul Steeit, J.
Pursuant to CPLB. 3212, plaintiff moves for summary judgment and judgment on the pleadings in his favor *1014restraining defendants, as members of the Board of Estimate of the City of New York, from passing upon and approving, disapproving or changing proposed budgets of the City of New York, and from exercising any other alleged legislative powers.
The material facts are not in dispute. There is no issue regarding the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint as to the great disparity in population among the five boroughs of the City of New York, nor do defendants deny that despite such variation, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Sailors v. Board of Ed. of Kent Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BusTop Shelters, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- O'Henry's Film Works, Inc. v. Bureau of Ferry & General Aviation OperationsNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Amsterdam v. HelsbyNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Amsterdam v. HelsbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975