Legal Opinion
Figueroa v. Cadbury Utility Construction Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 27, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered February 5, 1996, which, in a rear-end automobile accident case, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.
Defendant’s affidavit, asserting that he was cut off by plaintiff’s automobile, raises issues sufficient to defeat summary judgment (cf., Lenahan v Goucher, 65 NY2d 1034, revg on dissenting mem 111 AD2d 546, 548; Borgesano v Hertz Corp., 69 AD2d 894). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Tom and Andrias, JJ.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lenahan v. GoucherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Borgesano v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ramos v. RojasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Briceno v. MilbryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Connors v. FlahertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Hussain v. Manhattan Cable T.V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Morris v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.