Legal Opinion

Williams v. Auto Brokers

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided July 19, 1988No. Record No. 0889-87-4PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOON, J.

— John J. Williams seeks reversal of an Industrial Commission decision denying him compensation. The full commission determined that Williams’ testimony was not credible and could not support a finding that he had sustained a compensable injury. Williams maintains that because the deputy commissioner found him to be a credible witness, the full commission was bound to accept his testimony. We disagree.

One seeking compensation retains the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that he sustained a compensable injury. Hercules, Inc. v. Stump, 2 Va. App. 77, 79, 341…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gray v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  3. Hines v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  4. Board of Supervisors of Henrico County v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
  5. Hercules, Inc. v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  2. Bullion Hollow Enterprises, Inc. v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  3. Turcios v. Holiday Inn Fair OaksCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. BakkeCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  5. Gilman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API