Legal Opinion · Dissent

Neary v. Regents of University of California

California Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1992No. S020515Published

1DissentKennard, J.

I dissent.

More than just a dispute resolution service, the judiciary is an integral part of our government. Working in the context of actual disputes, courts interpret and enforce the policies adopted by the legislative process, striving always to give those policies coherence and vitality. Thus, when a trial court renders judgment in a particular case, it is not just deciding who wins and who loses, who pays and who recovers. Rather, the ultimate purpose of a judgment is to administer the laws of this state, and thereby to do substantial justice.

Because a judgment embodies an act of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc., and Ringsby-Pacific, Ltd. v. Western Conference of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Clarendon Ltd. v. Nu-West Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. In Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API