Dancy v. State

CRIST, Presiding Judge.

Movant is serving a sentence of twenty-five years imprisonment on his conviction of robbery in the first degree. He appeals from an order denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his motion under Rule 27.26 attacking his sentence. He also filed a notice of appeal from an order denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his pro se “Motion Under Rule 75.01 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct” the order denying his Rule 27.26 motion.

We first note that movant’s “Motion Under Rule 75.01 ...” was filed more than thirty days after entry of the order denying his Rule 27.26 motion, and…