Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 8, 1989No. 88-641, 88-782PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The summary judgment in favor of the insurer, Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, Inc., and its agent, J.D. Smith, and against the plaintiffs, Roxanne Smith and Dewey W. Smith, as tenants of the insured, Shirley J. Routh, is hereby affirmed on the authority of Armstrong v. Aetna Ins.Co., 448 So.2d 353 (Ala. 1983). See, also, Ranger Ins. Co. v.Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection Ins. Co., 410 So.2d 40 (Ala. 1982).

As to the cross-appeal, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendants' motions for sanctions and for attorney fees pursuant Ala.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ranger Ins. Co. v. HARTFORD STEAM, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Armstrong v. Aetna Ins. Com.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. PACIFIC ENT. OIL v. Howell PetroleumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. The Sanderson Group, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Brashear v. SpinksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. PACIFIC ENT. OIL v. Howell PetroleumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. The Sanderson Group, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API