Legal Opinion

Archuleta v. Hopper

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 13, 2015No. 2013-3177PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.

Katherine Archuleta, Director of the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”), petitions for review of a final order of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“the Board”) holding that an individual who meets the definition of an “employee” under 5 U.S.C. § 7511(a)(1) has a statutory right to appeal his OPM-directed suitability removal as an adverse action under 5 U.S.C. chapter 75, subchapter II. Hopper v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., 118 M.S.P.R. 608 (2012), aff'g Hopper v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., No. CH-073109-0798-1-3, 2012 MSPB LEXIS 1353 (Initial Decision, Mar. 8, 2012). OPM…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. O'Farrell v. Dep't of Def.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  2. Lal v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Ricci v. MSPBCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  4. U.S. Capitol Police v. Office of ComplianceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  5. Bannister v. DVACourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API