Legal Opinion

Rizzo v. Rizzo

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur W. Lonschein, J.

This is a motion to modify the language of a 1972 divorce judgment. The parties had entered into an agreement, and the Honorable Frederic E. Hammer, now deceased, directed in his findings of fact and conclusions of law "that the agreement signed by the parties on April 7, 1971 be incorporated in judgment but is not to merge.” The judgment, apparently signed contemporaneously with the findings and conclusions, omitted any language incorporating the agreement, either expressly or by reference.

*582Now, 18 years later, the defendant wife seeks a modification…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re HuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Solomon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ventura v. LeongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API