Legal Opinion
Reecer v. McKinnon Bridge Co.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided July 31, 1990No. 3-89-0205PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOHN T. NIXON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are the plaintiff’s and the defendants’ motions for summary judgment.
FACTS
The plaintiff, Joe Frank Reecer, was hired by the defendant McKinnon Bridge Company, Inc. on July 8, 1988 as a construction worker. The plaintiff continued to work for the defendant until the plaintiff was injured on October 5,1988. The defendant was involved in a road construction project which included the construction of a bridge across the Cumberland River at Carthage, Tennessee. The plaintiff served as a carpenter, general laborer and drill operator…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Foremost Insurance v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bonnette v. Shell Offshore, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1993
- In the Matter of the Complaint of Christopher Klassen, as Owner, and Jane Klassen, as Owner Pro Hac Vice, of a 1989 Sumersey motor vessel with Hull ID Number SZJ01588F889, for Exoneration from or Limitation of LiabilityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023