Legal Opinion

MacK v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 1, 1945No. 8667PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, circuit judge.

By virtue of provisions in the will of his father, petitioner acquired an option to purchase a limited number of shares of stock from the testamentary trustees at a price equal to one half of the average market value of the shares at the time of exercise of the option. The average market price of the shares was defined to be “the mean between the high and the low of the market price of said stock during the six (6) calendar months immediately preceding the date of the particular purchase * *

Petitioner exercised the option, purchasing the stock at $34.06 per share.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Helvering v. San Joaquin Fruit & Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert H. Campbell, United States of America v. Excavation Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  2. Molbreak v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  3. Milliken v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. MillikenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  4. Leslie J. Valleskey and Grace Valleskey v. E. J. Nelson, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  5. John J. Kalbac and Dorothy Kalbac v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, John G. Kiske and Clara Kiske v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API