Legal Opinion
Winchester v. City of Hopkinsville
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided March 11, 2015No. Civil Action No. 5:13-CV-00220-TBRPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
THOMAS B. RUSSELL, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon competing motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff William Winchester, proceeding pro se, first filed his motion for partial summary judgment. (Docket No. 8.) The City of Hopkinsville (“the City”) responded, (Docket No. 25), and Winchester replied, (Docket No. 20). The City also filed a motion for summary judgment, (Docket No. 26), to which Winchester has responded, (Docket No. 35), and the City has replied, (Docket No. 39). Fully briefed, these matters stand ripe for adjudication.
Winche…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hbr Madisonville, LLC v. Lori AtteburyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021