Legal Opinion

Walpole v. Whitsell

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard S. Lane, J.

This motion seeks summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s medical malpractice action as barred by the Statute of Limitations. Plaintiff in opposition relies on an apparently novel extension of the doctrine of continuous treatment (Borgia v City of New York, 12 NY2d 151).

Plaintiff’s family physician, Dr. Thomas Parks, recommended the excision and biopsy of an apparent mass in plaintiff’s left breast. The surgery was performed by defendant Dr. John Whitsell on June 24,1975 at the facilities of defendant New York Hospital. The biopsy was performed by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Di Sabato v. SoffesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  3. Fonda v. PaulsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Florio v. CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Florio v. CookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meath v. MishrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Robinson Ex Rel. Robinson v. Mount Sinai Medical CenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Walters v. RinkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API