Legal Opinion
In re Sherrills
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 24, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On November 12, 1996, we ordered that the Clerk of this court shall not accept for filing any additional, original actions from Daries Sherrills, unless accompanied by the docket fee and security deposit required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV. Sherrills v. Fuerst (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 1437, 671 N.E.2d 1021.
Based on Sherrills’s continued, prolonged pattern of filing repetitious, frivolous appeals in this court and abusing his informa pauperis status in this court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by the court that the Clerk of this court shall also not accept for filing any further appeals in this court without…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Demos v. StorrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Demos v. StorrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sherrills v. FuerstOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Sherrills v. Franklin Cty. Clerk of CourtsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Sherrills v. Clerk of CourtsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. Norris, 2006 Ca 00384 (5-21-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007