Chambers v. Chambers

This appeal must be dismissed because of the failure of the order appealed from to qualify as a final order under Rule 54 (b), ARCP.

Six of the heirs of W.M. Chambers sued two other Chambers' heirs, alternatively contending that a deed of certain real estate executed in favor of the two defendants and one of the plaintiffs was unsupported by consideration, or delivery was otherwise void for failure of Mrs. Chambers to join in its execution, or that it was the result of prenuptial fraud. They alleged that the deed was executed for convenience, with the parties having agreed that the grantor…