Legal Opinion

(SS) Shade v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 20, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01122Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ELIZABETH GAIL SHADE, No. 2:19-cv-1122-KJN 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 13 v. REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF Nos. 15, 16.) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Elizabeth Gail Shade seeks judicial review of a final decision by the 18 Commissioner of Social Security denying her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits and 19 Supplemental Security Income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.1 Plaintiff 20 moved…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Valentine v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Carl Edlund v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Gavin Buck v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API